0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Unregistered Deaths Among Extremely Low Birthweight Infants—Ohio, 2006 FREE

JAMA. 2008;299(3):282-283. doi:10.1001/jama.299.3.282.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2007;56:1101-1103

1 table omitted

In the United States, infants with birthweights <750 g (i.e., extremely low birthweight infants) account for <1% of all births but approximately one third of the total infant mortality rate.1 Because these infants often have short life spans, their deaths might be misclassified as fetal deaths, leading to an underestimation of the overall infant mortality rate. Accurate infant mortality rates are important for program planning and evaluation, identification of health disparities and emerging trends, and development of prevention strategies. To assess the extent of unregistered deaths among extremely low birthweight infants born in Ohio during January-June 2006, the Ohio Department of Health analyzed birth and death records from this period for all infants with birthweights <750 g (1.7 lbs) and contacted birth hospitals to follow up on the discharge status of these infants. This report describes the results of that analysis, which indicated that 7% of the extremely low birthweight infants who were born in Ohio during this period, and who subsequently died, had deaths that were unregistered. The findings emphasize the need for routine verification of the discharge status of these infants from their birth hospitals and follow-up to ensure proper registration of deaths.

Birth records for all infants with birthweights <750 g born in Ohio during January 1–June 30, 2006, were identified and matched with death records registered through December 31, 2006, using the Ohio Department of Health's vital statistics database. The birth hospitals of infants with only birth records were contacted by telephone to verify discharge status (i.e., alive to home, alive transferred, or deceased). Deaths among infants that were confirmed (via medical-record review) by the birth hospitals but for which no death records were found were considered unregistered deaths. Selected characteristics of extremely low birthweight infants with unregistered deaths (e.g., birthweight, race, and Medicaid coverage) were compared with those with registered deaths using data from birth records. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Among the 325 infants with birthweights <750 g, 192 (59%) had registered deaths, and 129 (40%) had no death records on file. Of the 129 infants with no death records on file, 115 (89%) were confirmed to be alive at the time of discharge from their birth hospitals; 14 (11%) were confirmed by their birth hospitals to have died. Thus, among the 325 extremely low birthweight infants, 206 deaths occurred, of which 192 (93%) were registered and 14 (7%) were unregistered. No statistically significant (p<0.05) differences were observed when comparing infants with unregistered deaths to those with registered deaths.

Reported by:

J Paulson, MS, W Ramsini, PhD, Ohio Dept of Health. E Conrey, PhD, R Duffy, DDS, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; MP Cooper, MD, EIS Officer, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:

Deaths among infants with extremely low birthweights are more likely to be unregistered because of the often short life spans of these infants and the potential for their deaths to be misclassified as fetal deaths. Previous studies indicate that numerous infant deaths likely have not been registered.24 In addition, in 2006, an analysis of CDC's linked birth/infant death data set for 2002-2004 demonstrated that numerous states reported infant mortality rates for infants with birthweights <500 g that were implausibly low (CDC, unpublished data, 2006), leading to concerns that these deaths were not being registered.

CDC recognizes that deaths among low birthweight infants might not be registered and requires that all states follow up on the discharge status of infants with birthweights <750 g. However, not all states currently supply this information to CDC, and the number of deaths that are not registered in many states remains unknown. These practices might indicate that states are underestimating their infant mortality rates, leading to an overall underestimation of the national infant mortality rate, information that is important to agencies for policy planning, program evaluation, research, and identification of health disparities and trends.

The results of this analysis indicate that an estimated 7% of deaths among infants born in Ohio with extremely low birthweights are not being registered. Reasons for the lack of registration of these deaths likely include confusion regarding whether they were fetal deaths or deaths of live-born infants. Although the resulting adjustment to Ohio's overall infant mortality rate is not substantial, programs that rely on accurate birthweight-specific infant mortality rates likely will observe a more pronounced effect. As a result of these findings, in 2007, the Ohio Department of Health plans to implement routine follow-up of infants with birthweights <750 g to ensure accurate birth and death records. This follow-up will include routine verification of the discharge status of all infants with birthweights <750 g and will ensure that all deceased infants have a registered death certificate. Officials in states that are not performing this follow-up also should consider implementing routine follow-up so that infant mortality rates are accurately reported.

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, the analysis was restricted to births that occurred in the first half of 2006. Findings from that period might not reflect the registration of deaths for the entire year. Moreover, a longer study period might have allowed for identification of any seasonal trends in registrations. Second, the small sample size might have prevented this analysis from detecting statistically significant differences between the registered and unregistered groups. Previous studies have indicated that the lack of registration of deaths in extremely low birthweight infants has occurred disproportionately for black infants, those born to unmarried mothers, and those born to mothers living in rural areas.2,3 Finally, the study design did not allow for identification of live-born infants whose deaths were misclassified as fetal deaths. Such infants would have received fetal death certificates instead of standard birth or death certificates.

In addition to routine follow-up of infants with extremely low birthweights, further research regarding the reasons for the lack of registration of certain infant deaths is needed. Findings from such research might help in targeting interventions to improve the accuracy of infant death reporting.

REFERENCES
Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2004 period linked birth/infant death data set.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;55(14):
PubMed
McCarthy BJ, Terry J, Rochat RW, Quave S, Tyler CW Jr. The underregistration of neonatal deaths: Georgia 1974-77.  Am J Public Health. 1980;70(9):977-982
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Rogers PB, Council CR, Abernathy JR. Testing death registration completeness in a group of premature infants.  Public Health Rep. 1961;76:717-724
PubMed   |  Link to Article
CDC.  Underreporting of neonatal deaths—Georgia, 1974-1977.  MMWR. 1979;28:253-254

Figures

Tables

References

Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2004 period linked birth/infant death data set.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;55(14):
PubMed
McCarthy BJ, Terry J, Rochat RW, Quave S, Tyler CW Jr. The underregistration of neonatal deaths: Georgia 1974-77.  Am J Public Health. 1980;70(9):977-982
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Rogers PB, Council CR, Abernathy JR. Testing death registration completeness in a group of premature infants.  Public Health Rep. 1961;76:717-724
PubMed   |  Link to Article
CDC.  Underreporting of neonatal deaths—Georgia, 1974-1977.  MMWR. 1979;28:253-254
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com