0
Book and Media Reviews |

COALESCE (CTSA Online Assistance for Leveraging the Science of Collaborative Effort)

Bradford W. Hesse, PhD
JAMA. 2011;306(17):1925-1926. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1593.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Clinicians and investigators know what it is like to work within the context of teams, both in biomedical practice and in biomedical research—but what does the scientific literature say about how best to apply the synergies of colocated and distant partners to solve specific problems efficiently in medicine? Biomedical researchers have often led the way in showing how new collaborative environments can lead to unprecedented advances in basic knowledge. Documentation of the more than 3 billion base pairs comprising the human genome could not have been completed without the computer-assisted collaborations of tens of thousands of scientists around the globe. Moving to the next level of science, in which the fundamental discoveries of molecular medicine are translated into safe and efficacious practice, will require the collaborative efforts of thousands more.1 If data are coming together to inform best practice within a “Learning Healthcare Organization,”2 can a similar set of evidence be applied to the task of forming and supporting multidisciplinary teams in biomedicine as well?

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Grahic Jump LocationImage not available.

TeamScience.net provides junior and senior faculty investigators and research development officers examples of real-world scenarios unique to cross-disciplinary, team-based research. There are 4 self-guided learning modules in all. Image published with permission of B. Spring, A. Moller, and H. J. Falk-Krzesinski, Northwestern University, 2011.

The Team Science Research Process in Clinical Medical Science. In this interactive course, the learner plays the role of a clinical investigator who is writing a grant proposal to conduct a multisite, cross-disciplinary study. Inset, Learners select questions by scrolling over icons that symbolize different aspects of assembling, managing, and evaluating a team. Clicking on icons yields answers in the form of animations, activities, or videotaped responses from experts. Images published with permission from B. Spring, A. Moller, and H. J. Falk-Krzesinski, Northwestern University, 2011.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Grahic Jump LocationImage not available.

TeamScience.net provides junior and senior faculty investigators and research development officers examples of real-world scenarios unique to cross-disciplinary, team-based research. There are 4 self-guided learning modules in all. Image published with permission of B. Spring, A. Moller, and H. J. Falk-Krzesinski, Northwestern University, 2011.

The Team Science Research Process in Clinical Medical Science. In this interactive course, the learner plays the role of a clinical investigator who is writing a grant proposal to conduct a multisite, cross-disciplinary study. Inset, Learners select questions by scrolling over icons that symbolize different aspects of assembling, managing, and evaluating a team. Clicking on icons yields answers in the form of animations, activities, or videotaped responses from experts. Images published with permission from B. Spring, A. Moller, and H. J. Falk-Krzesinski, Northwestern University, 2011.

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs