We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Commentary |

Equality-in-Quality in the Era of the Affordable Care Act

Matthew M. Davis, MD, MAPP; Jennifer K. Walter, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2011;306(8):872-873. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1208.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Health care received by patients in the United States is of inadequate quality.1 As part of the federal response to this major shortcoming, ensuring high-quality health care is a central theme throughout the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) signed into law in 2010.

The focus on improving quality in the ACA, however, effectively overshadows other major concerns about the US health care system—among them, pervasive and persistent disparities in health care related to factors such as sex, race/ethnicity, social class, insurance status, and language that fundamentally constrain how much overall quality can improve. The comparative inattention in the ACA to known inequalities in health care is noteworthy, not only in comparison with the focus on quality, but also because the lack of emphasis on disparities in the ACA language is inconsistent with recent positions of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)2 and the Institute of Medicine (IOM).3 The AHRQ and IOM have indicated that reducing disparities is an unambiguous priority in working to improve quality in health care.13 This approach is consistent with analyses suggesting that reducing disparities based on social factors may improve health care quality more than would marginal improvements in overall medical care.4

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

4 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
New Opportunities for Funding Dialysis-Dependent Undocumented Individuals. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Published online Aug 30, 2016;
Health Reform and Beyond. J Allied Health 2016;45(3):159-67.