0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Partnerships Between Universities and Industry

Lynn H. Ehrle, MEd
JAMA. 2002;287(11):1398-1400. doi:10.1001/jama.287.11.1395.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

To the Editor: Drs Gelijns and Thier1 argue that the relationship between university and industry should be reconsidered by "balancing risks against benefits" and then, in an apparent contradiction, urge university and industry "to maximize the upsides of collaboration and minimize the downsides," a premise they adopt by disregarding several substantive conflicts of interest. For example, the past decade has seen a growing number of university presidents and medical leaders who accept appointments to health-related corporate boards of directors, thus assuming fiduciary responsibilities on behalf of their stockholders. This role is in direct conflict with student and patient welfare and the overall mission of the university, not to mention the message it sends to faculty, researchers, and physicians. Angell2 asks, "How can they [academic medical institutions] justify rigorous conflict-of-interest policies for individual researchers when their own ties are so extensive?" She also warns, "The incentives of the market-place should not become woven into the fabric of academic medicine."

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 2

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();