We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Ramipril and Risk of Diabetes—Reply

Salim Yusuf, DPhil, FRCPC
JAMA. 2002;287(2):186-187. doi:10.1001/jama.287.2.186.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply: Dr Potyk raises the interesting question of what is gained by secondary publications from large trials after the main article has been published. First, the main report of a trial is generally too concise to include all the important information. Second, some information (usually secondary outcomes) may be mentioned very briefly (eg, 1 line regarding prevention of diabetes with ramipril in our original article) so that the information is either missed by readers or is not provided in adequate detail for careful evaluation.1 Third, some data are of interest to some parts of the scientific community and not to others. As an example, in HOPE there was substantial benefit with ramipril among those with peripheral arterial disease. Hence a detailed and separate report would be necessary. Fourth, substudies that focus on specific outcomes not included in the primary report (eg, carotid atherosclerosis,2 left ventricular hypertrophy, renal disease progression) require separate publication. Fifth, new observational analysis (eg, the prediction of events by even small increases in urinary microalbumin excretion) deserve public dissemination.3 We believe that an enormous amount of useful knowledge can be derived from large carefully conducted studies through judicious publications and that full dissemination of these results is likely to be helpful to the scientific community.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.