We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Using Meta-analysis to Answer Clinical Questions—Reply

John P. A. Ioannidis, MD; Despina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, MD; Joseph Lau, MD
JAMA. 2001;286(21):2669-2670. doi:10.1001/jama.286.21.2665.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply: We agree with Dr Laheij that exploration of heterogeneity sources may provide valuable information, especially for controversial medical topics for which therapeutic or preventive effects of different magnitude are obtained by different study designs.1 We also agree that empirical meta-analytic evaluations can be applied in other types of studies as well.

Dr Theodoropoulos and colleagues reduce meta-analysis to a method that simply lumps information and biases. We do not share this view. Meta-analysis has the potential to systematically examine the strengths and weaknesses of the accumulated evidence, explore heterogeneity between studies (including those of different designs), and identify potential biases. As a form of original research, meta-analysis does not compete with or substitute for other original work. It functions at a different level than single original studies and has been widely accepted as the highest level in the hierarchy of evidence.2,3 We welcome criticism of meta-analysis, which may help refine further its methods. However, when a meta-analysis shows that no more research is needed or that there are overt biases that should be appropriately corrected, then it is equivalent to misconduct to perform further clinical studies or to conduct new studies without correcting known biases.4


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.