We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Methodological Issues in Trials of Acupuncture

Erica Frank, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2001;285(8):1015-1016. doi:10.1001/jama.285.8.1013.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor: Dr Shen and colleagues1 conclude that electroacupuncture helps control chemotherapy-induced emesis. I believe that the only legitimate conclusion of their study is that more intensive placebo is more effective than less intensive placebo. There are 2 flaws in their study design, both related to blinding. First, despite the authors' claims to the contrary, their subjects seem not to have been fully blinded to the procedure. Those receiving electroacupuncture had a more complex intervention, and this alone could have produced a greater placebo effect than that received by those with minimal needling. The group receiving electroacupuncture had more manipulation and experienced more sensation and discomfort during the procedure and was more likely to report having received excellent quality acupuncture. This suggests (although not statistically significantly, perhaps because of small numbers) that these patients were more likely to think they were getting "real" acupuncture and, perhaps, that they were not naive recipients of acupuncture and knew whether they were receiving "real" treatment. Second, the acupuncturists were not blinded to the procedure type they were administering; their attitudes could well have been conveyed to the participants. Acupuncturists could have been blinded by a variety of means, including training previously untrained individuals specifically for this process or not telling participating clinicians the study design or particular desired outcomes.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

9 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.