We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

What Is the Best Evidence for Making Clinical Decisions?—Reply

Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc; David Naylor, MD, PhD; W. Scott Richardson, MD; Lee Green, MD, MPH; R. Brian Haynes, MD, PhD; Mark C. Wilson, MD, MPH; Deborah J. Cook, MD, MSc; Roman Z. Jaeschke, MD, MSc
JAMA. 2000;284(24):3127-3128. doi:10.1001/jama.284.24.3123.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply: Dr Shah suggests that systematic reviews of observational studies provide better evidence than single randomized trials. We disagree strongly. Shah's proposal would, for instance, rank a meta-analyses of observational studies of hormone replacement therapy1 (which suggested a 50% reduction in relative risk of coronary events) higher than the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) RCT,2 which found no effect of hormone replacement therapy for secondary prevention of coronary events. We would rank the HERS RCT higher and, pending further RCT evidence, would not recommend hormone replacement therapy to women to decrease their risk of cardiovascular events. When consistent biases exist in observational studies (such as the tendency for women with lower cardiovascular risk to receive hormone replacement therapy), a meta-analysis offers no protection.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.