To the Editor: Dr He and colleagues1 claim that the overall benefit of aspirin use on
myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke outweighs its risk of hemorrhagic
stroke in most populations. However, they also suggest that the risk-benefit
ratio of aspirin treatment for prevention of cardiovascular disease in populations
with a high risk of hemorrhagic stroke should be addressed in subsequent studies.
Indeed, Asian people have been known to have such an increased risk
of brain hemorrhage in comparison to brain infarction and myocardial infarction.2 For example, crude annual incidence rate of stroke
and myocardial infarction per 10,000 population aged 40 years or older during
1988-1991 in Japanese people in Okinawa were as follows3:
8 events for myocardial infarction, 18 for ischemic stroke, and 14 for hemorrhagic
stroke. By applying the relative risks calculated by He and colleagues (relative
risk reduction of 32% for myocardial infarction and 18% for ischemic stroke,
respectively, and relative risk increase of 84% for hemorrhagic stroke) for
Japanese people in Okinawa, aspirin use would be associated with an absolute
risk reduction in myocardial infarction of 3 events per 10,000 persons and,
for ischemic stroke, a reduction of 3 events per 10,000 persons. However,
aspirin treatment also would be associated with an absolute risk increase
in hemorrhagic stroke of 12 events per 10,000 persons. Likewise, the number
needed to treat to prevent 1 event would be 3333 for myocardial infarction
and 3333 for ischemic stroke. The number needed to treat to cause 1 event
would be 833 for hemorrhagic stroke.