We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Autopsy Rates and Diagnosis

Carl D. Atkins, MD
JAMA. 1999;281(23):2181. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-281-23-jac90005.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor: Dr Burton and colleagues1 present important new information on the correlation between clinical and autopsy diagnosis of malignancies. However, their analysis suffers due to the use of the wrong denominators, which leads to misleading conclusions. Although it is true that only 125 of the 225 patients with malignancies found at autopsy were correctly diagnosed, the appropriate denominator to measure discordance is 1105 cases since we must consider those patients correctly determined not to have malignancies. Additionally, of the 111 malignancies in the 100 patients whom the authors considered underdiagnosed, 34 were correctly diagnosed as having malignancies on clinical grounds and 24 had incidental malignancies. Only 8 malignancies were given an incorrect diagnosis. Thus, only about 45 (4%) of 1105 cases had clinically unsuspected malignancies that were not merely incidental (the authors analyzed their underdiagnosed cases by malignancy, not by patients, so the number of cases may be somewhat greater or less than 45). Apparently all 880 patients without malignancies were correctly identified as such clinically (the authors do not specifically state this). Only 8 (6%) of 133 pathologically diagnosed malignancies were assigned an incorrect histology or primary site. These data suggest to me that we have excellent modern diagnostic tools which have led to highly accurate clinical diagnoses, at least in New Orleans, La.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.