Letters |

Bevacizumab and Cancer Treatment-Related Mortality

Zu-Yao Yang, MD; Chen Mao, MD; Jin-Ling Tang, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2011;305(22):2291-2293. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.757.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor: We found some errors in the results in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab by Dr Ranpura and colleagues.1

The numbers of fatal adverse events (FAEs) were extracted incorrectly or by using different extraction criteria from some of the included studies. In the study by Hurwitz et al,2 the incidence of FAEs (“adverse event leading to death”) was 10 of 393 in the bevacizumab group and 11 of 397 in the placebo group, as opposed to 1 of 393 and 0 of 397 as reported by Ranpura et al.1 In the study by Escudier et al,3 8 of 337 in the treatment group and 7 of 304 in the control group had a “death not due to disease progression,” in contrast to 3 of 337 and 0 of 304 reported by Ranpura et al.1 In addition, the authors used the incorrect denominator for the incidence of FAEs in the study by Saltz et al4: it should be 694 in the bevacizumab group and 675 in the placebo group, instead of 675 in the treatment group and 694 in the control group, as reported in the review.1


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




June 8, 2011
Cornelis J. A. Punt, MD, PhD; Linda Mol, MSc; Miriam Koopman, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2011;305(22):2291-2293. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.758.
June 8, 2011
Patricia B. Cerrito, PhD
JAMA. 2011;305(22):2291-2293. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.759.
June 8, 2011
Shenhong Wu, MD, PhD; Vishal Ranpura, MD; Sanjay Hapani, MD
JAMA. 2011;305(22):2291-2293. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.760.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.