We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Patient Autonomy and Clinician Integrity in Treatment Decisions

Ian Jenkins, MD
JAMA. 2011;305(18):1861-1862. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.585.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor: Dr Lantos and colleagues discussed conflict between patient autonomy and clinician integrity in the case of a young man only days from death, conflict that occurred because the team advised not hospice care but intensive care.1 Cost was mentioned tangentially in a comment about how outside parties, including insurance companies, may limit therapeutic options. Consideration of treatment options without considering cost is common. In a discussion of mammography recommendations, Quanstrum and Hayward2 suggested not recommending care that causes a net harm but leaving decisions about care offering minimal benefit to individual clinicians and their patients, with no mention of cost. Quill et al3 discussed treatment preferences of patients with severe illness who want “everything,” again without mention of cost. In contrast, in an article on the role of chemotherapy at the end of life, Harrington and Smith4 specifically discussed reimbursement and economic issues and concluded that, “unless resources are unlimited, patients and families (or society at large) may be asked to balance individual patient needs against those of society.”


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




May 11, 2011
John Lantos, MD; Ann Marie Matlock, RN, MSN; David Wendler, PhD
JAMA. 2011;305(18):1861-1862. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.586.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.